<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MacJournal.org &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macjournal.org/tag/iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macjournal.org</link>
	<description>Mac Tips, Tricks, News And Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google snubs Adobe with non-Flash Pac-Man tribute that’s playable on iPhone, iPad</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/05/23/google-snubs-adobe-with-non-flash-pac-man-tribute-that%e2%80%99s-playable-on-iphone-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/05/23/google-snubs-adobe-with-non-flash-pac-man-tribute-that%e2%80%99s-playable-on-iphone-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 08:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash pac-man tribute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google snubs adoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Google dealt a snub to Adobe on Friday with a tribute to the 30th anniversary of Pac-Man,&#8221; Electronista reports. &#8220;Despite sharing stage time with Adobe just this week, a playable version of Pac-Man on the page works with both the iPad and iPhone &#8211; revealing that it&#8217;s not using Flash,&#8221; Electronista reports. &#8220;Apple&#8217;s phones and other touchscreen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google dealt a snub to Adobe on Friday with a tribute to the 30th anniversary of Pac-Man,&#8221; Electronista reports.</p>
<p>&#8220;Despite sharing stage time with Adobe just this week, a playable version of Pac-Man on the page works with both the iPad and iPhone &#8211; revealing that it&#8217;s not using Flash,&#8221; Electronista reports. &#8220;Apple&#8217;s phones and other touchscreen devices instead use swipe gestures to steer the classic arcade game.&#8221;</p>
<p>Electronista reports, &#8220;Although it goes without a plugin, it still includes most features of the Namco original.&#8221;</p>
<p>Full article <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/05/21/google.snubs.adobe.by.making.non.flash.game/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/05/23/google-snubs-adobe-with-non-flash-pac-man-tribute-that%e2%80%99s-playable-on-iphone-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, Android did NOT just pass iPhone in mobile web traffic, not even close</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/28/no-android-did-not-just-pass-iphone-in-mobile-web-traffic-not-even-close/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/28/no-android-did-not-just-pass-iphone-in-mobile-web-traffic-not-even-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adroid not just pass iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile web traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Android did just NOT pass the iPhone in Web traffic in the U.S. last month, despite a story on TechCrunch with that assertion as the headline,&#8221; Dan Frommer reports or The Business Insider. &#8220;Based on recent comScore data, we estimate that iPhone-based web traffic is still at least 2X Android web traffic in the U.S.&#8221; Frommer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android did just NOT pass the iPhone in Web traffic in the U.S. last month, despite a story on TechCrunch with that assertion as the headline,&#8221; Dan Frommer reports or The Business Insider. &#8220;Based on recent comScore data, we estimate that iPhone-based web traffic is still at least 2X Android web traffic in the U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p>Frommer reports, &#8220;So why did TechCrunch get it wrong? The TechCrunch post is based on the latest monthly ad statistics from AdMob, a mobile ad network that&#8217;s being acquired by Google. Specifically, one graph in AdMob&#8217;s report showed that in March, Android&#8217;s percentage of ad requests in AdMob&#8217;s network surpassed theiPhone for the first time.<br />
<span id="more-1884"></span><br />
&#8220;TechCrunch takes this to mean that Android Web traffic exceeded iPhone Web traffic. &#8220;AdMob measures mobile ad impressions, which is a proxy for overall traffic,&#8221; TechCrunch&#8217;s Leena Rao explains,&#8221; Frommer reports. &#8220;That&#8217;s simply not accurate. While Android&#8217;s user base &#8212; and Web traffic consumption &#8212; is growing and could eventually rival Apple&#8217;s, AdMob&#8217;s ad request data is NOT a proxy for mobile web usage in general.&#8221;</p>
<p>Frommer reports, &#8220;iPhone users still outnumber Android users in the U.S. by at least 2 to 1, based on recent comScore data&#8230; It is not valid to say that Android passed iPhone in web usage using only AdMob&#8217;s ad statistics as evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Full article <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/no-android-did-not-just-pass-iphone-web-traffic-in-the-us-2010-4" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24996/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/28/no-android-did-not-just-pass-iphone-in-mobile-web-traffic-not-even-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Apple lost their 4G iPhone</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/20/how-apple-lost-their-4g-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/20/how-apple-lost-their-4g-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4G]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Gourmet Haus Staudt. A nice place to enjoy good German ales,&#8221; Jesus Diaz reports for Gizmodo. &#8220;And if you are an Apple Software Engineer named Gray Powell and you get one too many beers, it&#8217;s also a nice place to lose the next-generation iPhone.&#8221; &#8220;The 27-year-old Powell—a North Carolina State University 2006 graduate and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Gourmet Haus Staudt. A nice place to enjoy good German ales,&#8221; Jesus  Diaz reports for Gizmodo.  &#8220;And if you are an Apple Software Engineer  named Gray Powell and you get one too many beers, it&#8217;s also a nice place  to lose the next-generation iPhone.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The 27-year-old Powell—a North Carolina State University 2006 graduate  and talented amateur photographer—is an Apple Software Engineer working  on the iPhone Baseband Software, the little program that enables the  iPhone to make calls,&#8221; Diaz reports.<br />
<span id="more-1825"></span><br />
&#8220;On the night of March 18, he was enjoying the fine imported ales at  Gourmet Haus Staudt, a nice German beer garden in Redwood City,  California. He was happy. The place was great. The beer was excellent.  &#8216;I underestimated how good German beer is,&#8217; he typed into the  next-generation iPhone he was testing on the field, cleverly disguised  as an iPhone 3GS,&#8221; Diaz reports.  &#8220;It was his last Facebook update from  the secret iPhone. It was the last time he ever saw the iPhone, right  before he abandoned it on bar stool, leaving to go home.&#8221;</p>
<p>Full article <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520438/how-apple-lost-the-next-iphone" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24875/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/20/how-apple-lost-their-4g-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once you go iPhone, you’ll never disown</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/08/once-you-go-iphone-you%e2%80%99ll-never-disown/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/08/once-you-go-iphone-you%e2%80%99ll-never-disown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Apple is projected to have sold 7.5 million iPhones in the first three months of 2010, and a new study suggests those users won&#8217;t be leaving anytime soon, with high retention rates due to the investments many users have made in App Store software,&#8221; Katie Marsal reports for AppleInsider. &#8220;Analyst Maynard Um with UBS issued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/iphone-touchscreen.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1633" title="iphone-touchscreen" src="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/iphone-touchscreen-300x284.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="199" /></a>&#8220;Apple is projected to have sold 7.5 million iPhones in the first three months of 2010, and a new study suggests those users  won&#8217;t be leaving anytime soon, with high retention rates due to the  investments many users have made in App Store software,&#8221; Katie Marsal  reports for AppleInsider.</p>
<p>&#8220;Analyst Maynard Um with UBS issued a new note to investors Wednesday  morning, in which he noted a recent Q-Series survey that found Apple  leads the smartphone industry in both mindshare and retention rate,&#8221;  Marsal reports.  &#8220;Among respondents, 56 percent said they believe Apple  is the best smartphone manufacturer, and the implied retention rate  among a sample of 310 users is 95 percent &#8212; well beyond, Um noted,  anything else seen ever in the industry.&#8221;<br />
<span id="more-1761"></span><br />
&#8220;&#8216;While we believe that this retention can change rapidly, anecdotally  during our survey we even received emails from three respondents asking  when the next iPhone will be available,&#8217; the analyst wrote,&#8221; Marsal reports.  &#8220;A whopping 90  percent of iPhone owners think that Apple is the best handset maker on  the market.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marsal reports, &#8220;The report also issued the first estimate from UBS on  iPad sales. Um expects Apple to ship 2.1 million in its 2010 fiscal  year, growing to 4.6 million in 2011.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24710/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/08/once-you-go-iphone-you%e2%80%99ll-never-disown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this Apple’s next-gen iPhone? (with video)</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/08/is-this-apple%e2%80%99s-next-gen-iphone-with-video/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/08/is-this-apple%e2%80%99s-next-gen-iphone-with-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple next-gen iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next gen iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this Apple&#8217;s next-gen iPhone&#8217;s &#8220;HD touchscreen&#8221; and casing? Direct link via YouTube here. Source: MacDailyNews]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this Apple&#8217;s next-gen iPhone&#8217;s &#8220;HD touchscreen&#8221; and casing?</p>
<p>Direct link via YouTube <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_L0GRIXU-mA" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24707/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/04/08/is-this-apple%e2%80%99s-next-gen-iphone-with-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The six most important hidden iPhone shortcuts</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/22/the-six-most-important-hidden-iphone-shortcuts/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/22/the-six-most-important-hidden-iphone-shortcuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden iphone shortcuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone shortcuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The simplicity of the iPhone and lack of buttons belies a wealth of shortcuts,&#8221; Tom Kaneshige reports for ITworld. &#8220;We&#8217;ve picked six of the most important ones.&#8221; • Two-Button Screenshot • Double-Click Camera • Three-finger Zoom • Hold for Voice Activation • Double-Tap Safari • Concurrent Voice and Data Full article here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The simplicity of the iPhone and lack of buttons belies a wealth of shortcuts,&#8221; Tom Kaneshige  reports for ITworld.  &#8220;We&#8217;ve picked six of the most important ones.&#8221;</p>
<p>• Two-Button Screenshot<br />
• Double-Click Camera<br />
• Three-finger Zoom<br />
• Hold for Voice Activation<br />
• Double-Tap Safari<br />
• Concurrent Voice and Data</p>
<p>Full article <a href="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/101341/six-hidden-iphone-shortcuts" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/22/the-six-most-important-hidden-iphone-shortcuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Apple ban iPhone, iPod, and MacBook screen protectors from their stores?</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/19/why-did-apple-ban-iphone-ipod-and-macbook-screen-protectors-from-their-stores/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/19/why-did-apple-ban-iphone-ipod-and-macbook-screen-protectors-from-their-stores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store ban screen protectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban screen protectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Apple is reportedly removing iPhone, iPod, and MacBook screen protectors from its online and retail stores, just a couple of weeks before the iPad hits the stand,&#8221; Sarah Jacobsson reports for PCWorld. &#8220;Apple has yet to reveal the reason it is pulling protective products from its shelves. A popular speculation is that Apple wants to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/screen_protector.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1684" title="screen_protector" src="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/screen_protector-300x282.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="169" /></a>&#8220;Apple is reportedly removing iPhone, iPod, and MacBook screen  protectors from its online and retail stores, just a couple of weeks  before the iPad hits the stand,&#8221; Sarah Jacobsson reports for PCWorld.</p>
<p>&#8220;Apple has yet to reveal the reason it is pulling protective products  from its shelves. A popular speculation is that Apple wants to promote  the idea that its product&#8217;s screens are sturdy enough that they don&#8217;t  need to be protected (even though anyone who&#8217;s ever dropped an iPhone  knows this is far from the case),&#8221; Jacobsson reports. &#8220;That&#8217;s no  explanation for why Apple is also banning antiglare, mirrored, and  privacy film, unless they also hope to promote the idea that their  screens are easy to read in the sun, can double as mirrors, and have  magical privacy properties.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jacobsson reports, &#8220;Another speculation is that the products, while  popular, are hard to apply and thus have a higher rate of return than  other products.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s &#8220;latest iPhone and iPod Touch screens are surprisingly resistant  to, well, everything &#8212; from finger oil to water to barbecue sauce, and  don&#8217;t scratch very easily. Even my iPhone 3G (without the [3GS's]  &#8216;oleophobic&#8217; screen) is pretty resistant to scratches&#8230; Macworld points  out that it&#8217;s probably no coincidence that Apple is pulling screen  protectors right before the introduction of the iPad &#8212; but why? Could  Apple be thinking of debuting its very own line of (OLEOPHOBIC) screen  protectors?&#8221;</p>
<p>Full article <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/191826/apples_ban_on_screen_protectors_makes_sense_sort_of.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24433/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/19/why-did-apple-ban-iphone-ipod-and-macbook-screen-protectors-from-their-stores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sources: iPad could outsell iPhone in first 3 months; Apple still working on TV show deals</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/19/sources-ipad-could-outsell-iphone-in-first-3-months-apple-still-working-on-tv-show-deals/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/19/sources-ipad-could-outsell-iphone-in-first-3-months-apple-still-working-on-tv-show-deals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad to outsell iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Since the iPad became available for pre-order last Friday, Apple has sold hundreds of thousands of the device, say people familiar with the matter,&#8221; Yukari Iwatani Kane and Sam Schechner report for The Wall Street Journal. &#8220;One of these people said Apple could sell more iPads in its first three months than it sold iPhones [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/100130_ipad_games.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1421 alignleft" title="100130_ipad_games" src="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/100130_ipad_games-276x300.jpg" alt="" width="221" height="240" /></a>&#8220;Since the iPad became available for pre-order last Friday, Apple has  sold hundreds of thousands of the device, say people familiar with the  matter,&#8221; Yukari Iwatani Kane and Sam Schechner report for The Wall  Street Journal.  &#8220;One of these people said Apple could sell more iPads  in its first three months than it sold iPhones in the three months after the smart phone&#8217;s debut.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The company is still negotiating with media companies for a price cut  on TV shows that people can download onto the device, said people  familiar with the matter,&#8221; Kane and Schechner report.</p>
<p>Kane and Schechner report that &#8220;nailing down the content has proven  difficult as some potential collaborators weigh the advantages of  working with Apple against the potential threats to their current  sources of revenue, these people add&#8230; The last-minute discussions show  the complexities that Apple and Chief Executive Steve Jobs are facing  in creating a networked multimedia device, which has pushed the company  to pare back some of its initial intentions for the iPad&#8217;s release.&#8221;</p>
<p>Full article <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703523204575129862264704190.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24434/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/19/sources-ipad-could-outsell-iphone-in-first-3-months-apple-still-working-on-tv-show-deals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40% of Blackberry users willing to trade in their devices for Apple iPhones</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/18/40-of-blackberry-users-willing-to-trade-in-their-devices-for-apple-iphones/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/18/40-of-blackberry-users-willing-to-trade-in-their-devices-for-apple-iphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry vs iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly 40% of Blackberry users continue to prefer Apple&#8217;s iPhone as their next smartphone purchase, but a third of them would also switch to the Android operating system, according to the second smartphone brand loyalty survey conducted semi-annually via Crowd Science&#8217;s advanced research platform for online audience measurement. The Crowd Scientists also found Android users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly 40% of Blackberry users continue to prefer Apple&#8217;s iPhone as  their next smartphone purchase, but a third of them would also switch to  the Android operating system, according to the second smartphone brand  loyalty survey conducted semi-annually via Crowd Science&#8217;s advanced  research platform for online audience measurement. The Crowd Scientists  also found Android users rivaling iPhone users in loyalty, with about  90% of each user group planning to stick with their current brand when  buying their next phone.<br />
<a href="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/iphone-vs-blackberry-9000jpg.jpeg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1665" title="iphone-vs-blackberry-9000jpg" src="http://macjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/iphone-vs-blackberry-9000jpg-300x223.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="223" /></a><br />
Asked specifically if they&#8217;d swap their present phone for Google&#8217;s new  Android-based Nexus One, 32% of Blackberry users said &#8220;yes,&#8221; compared  with just 9% of iPhone users. This figure zoomed to 60% for users of  smartphones not made by Blackberry or Apple.</p>
<p>&#8220;These results show that the restlessness of Blackberry users with their  current brand hasn&#8217;t just been driven by the allure of iPhone,&#8221; said  John Martin, CEO of Crowd Science, in the press release. &#8220;Rather,  Blackberry as a brand just isn&#8217;t garnering the loyalty seen with other  mobile operating systems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Crowd Science&#8217;s methodology applies rigorous sampling and research  techniques to online populations, allowing for real-time results.  Indeed, a significant event affecting the research – the debut of Nexus  One on January 5 – occurred midway through the Dec. 24. 2009 to Jan. 21,  2010 study period. Rather than being a disruptive factor, however, the  Crowd Scientists were able to measure how the launch affected the  attitudes of respondents. For example, awareness of the Android  operating system jumped six points – to 66% from 60%. Moving from  awareness to familiarity, however, results were stable throughout the  research period – at about 10% for all smartphone users excluding  Android owners.<br />
<span id="more-1664"></span><br />
Awareness of the Google Nexus One phone itself following launch was  found to be 91% amongst iPhone users, 75% amongst Blackberry users, and  73% amongst users of other smartphones.</p>
<p>Other survey results include:<br />
Android users skew younger and less affluent than iPhone and Blackberry  users. Users of all types of smartphones had downloaded more free  applications than paid ones during the preceding seven days, with iPhone  users significantly more likely to pay for apps, Android users leading  in free apps, and Blackbery users far behind on both fronts. Both  Android users and iPhone users were found much more likely than  Blackberry users to use their phones only for personal use (32%, 28% and  16% respectively). On the other hand, 7% of Blackberry users use their  phone only for business, with that category of user minimal with iPhone  (1%) and non-existent in the Android base.</p>
<p>For the survey, the Crowd Scientists tapped 1,140 respondents who were  randomly recruited via the Crowd Science Sample Beta program from  websites serving more than 20 million unique visitors. The vast majority  of respondents (44%) used a regular cell phone, not a smart phone.  iPhone users represented 17% of the respondents, followed by Blackberry  users (15%), Nokia (10%), Windows Mobile (4%), Android (3%) and Palm  (2%).</p>
<p>More Details from the study <a href="http://info.crowdscience.com/l/1742/2010-03-14/13LXT/1742/19507/Android_Study.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/03/18/40-of-blackberry-users-willing-to-trade-in-their-devices-for-apple-iphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video chat coming to next-gen iPhones/iPads?</title>
		<link>http://macjournal.org/2010/02/23/video-chat-coming-to-next-gen-iphonesipads/</link>
		<comments>http://macjournal.org/2010/02/23/video-chat-coming-to-next-gen-iphonesipads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macjournal.org/?p=1532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Some interesting information has come to light&#8230; that may indicate a future direction of Apple&#8217;s iPhone OS products,&#8221; Chauncey Dupree reports for 9 to 5 Mac. Dupree points to &#8220;some pretty definitive evidence that future iPhones and iPads will have video chatting capability&#8230; Icons were found in the 3.2 SDK which seem to indicate that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some interesting information has come to light&#8230; that may indicate a future direction of Apple&#8217;s iPhone OS products,&#8221; Chauncey Dupree reports for 9 to 5 <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24124/#" target="_blank">Mac<img src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif" alt="" /></a>.</p>
<p>Dupree points to &#8220;some pretty definitive evidence that future <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24124/#" target="_blank">iPhones<img src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif" alt="" /></a> and iPads will have video chatting capability&#8230; Icons were found in the 3.2 SDK which seem to indicate that there will be video calling on a future iPxxx device.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, Dupress reports, &#8220;Hidden in some of the underlying iPad telephony apps are some VideoChat strings that are equally, if not more, telling evidence of future VideoChatting capabilities&#8230; Also, we&#8217;ve found some references to &#8216;iChat.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Full article, with screenshots, <a href="http://9to5mac.com/iphone-video-chat-340968306" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/24124/" target="_blank">MacDailyNews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macjournal.org/2010/02/23/video-chat-coming-to-next-gen-iphonesipads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
